Michigan iGaming Bill Adds Sports Betting
Three measures that would establish a framework to legalize and regulate online gambling and sports betting recently passed the Michigan House Regulatory and Reform Committee in a 12-3 vote. HB 4926, sponsored by state Rep. Brandt Iden, would allow and license internet gaming, create the Division of Internet Gaming in the Michigan Gaming Control Board, impose a tax of 10 percent on gross gaming revenue on licensed internet gaming, establish the Internet Gaming Fund and specify civil sanctions and criminal penalties for Act violations. It recently was amended to include sports betting.
Iden’s original bill received a hearing with the same House committee in September. But the measure stalled there, partly as a result of a lack of support from Detroit’s three commercial casino operators and strong opposition from the state’s tribal gaming operators.
The legislation now is headed to the full House for consideration in the 2018 session. Michigan would be the fifth state to legalize online poker if the bills pass.
HB 4926’s sports betting amendment states an internet gaming licensee may “conduct internet wagering under this act on any amateur or professional sporting event or contest, if that internet wagering is not prohibited by federal law.” Iden said, “That language is in there to start the next round of conversations. I don’t want us to get ahead of ourselves, but we know that is coming. The repeal of the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act is likely coming in the spring and we want to put Michigan in position to put our best foot forward as it related to sports gaming.”
Iden added, “A number of casinos have reached out to me and expressed interest in opening up a sportsbook, and we want to make sure they not only have the opportunity to do that in the brick-and-mortar casino but with hand-held devices and online as well. I think this is a good first step in that direction, but we have to get this component done first. We’ll make sure we can shepherd through and get to the governor’s desk an agreement to do online gaming, and I think from there the next step will be sports gaming.”
Iden also introduced a companion bill, HB 4927, which would clarify that gambling activities conducted in accordance with HB 4926 would not fall under earlier laws included in Michigan’s penal codes. State Rep. Klint Klesko sponsored HB 4928, outlining civil and criminal punishments for online gaming violations, if Iden’s two bills would take effect.
Under the proposed laws, any existing Michigan casino property would be eligible to apply for an online license for $200,000 plus a $100,000 annual renewal fee. Software platform providers would pay an application fee of $100,000 plus $50,000 per year thereafter. Ancillary services also would be licensed.
Besides including sports betting, the changes to Iden’s legislation also requires online gambling servers to be located on casino property, to cover any concerns over the Michigan state constitution’s requirement that casino gambling take place “in the casino.” Observers said this change was made to appeal to Sheldon Adelson’s Coalition to Stop Internet Gambling.
Another change reduces the online gambling tax rate from 15 percent to 10 percent. That rate could drop to as low as 6 percent, Michigan Gaming Control Board deputy director David Murley warned, because the state’s 12 tribal gaming compacts will have to be renegotiated.
The changes were enough to convince Michigan’s three major commercial casinos to support H 4926. Tribal operators still remain neutral or strongly opposed. They could be licensed for online gaming directly through the state by negotiating existing or new compacts. Six of Michigan’s 12 federally recognized tribal nations currently operate one or more land-based tribal casinos and pay taxes of 4-12 percent of gross gaming revenue. Under Iden’s bill, “Tribal casinos that currently make revenue sharing payments could choose to withhold payments if they deem online gaming to be an expansion of gaming. Each tribe would have to determine whether revenues generated from online gaming would exceed revenues saved from withholding state payments.”
Iden stated, “What’s going to be acceptable to some tribes isn’t going to be acceptable to all. I’m willing to work to get common-ground language with as many as I can, and others will continue to be in opposition. You can’t always get every stakeholder’s support.”
State Senator Mike Kowal found that out earlier this year when his SB 203 passed the Senate Regulatory Reform Committee but tribal operators’ concerns slowed it down. Kowall met with various parties to discuss possible changes in the bill.
Iden said he plans to keep the momentum for internet gambling going in January. He said he will hold meetings with stakeholders in January and February with the goal of getting a House vote in first quarter 2018.